5 Key Things You Need to Know About Important New Study on the Benefits of KIPP Pre-K

Analysis: Why Charlottesville Is a Wakeup Call for Educators Who Believe in Equal Promise for All Students

Bertelli: Why a Recent Drop in Charter School Support Is Not About Charter School Quality

Langhorne: When Pursuing Education Becomes a Crime, It’s the System That Should Be Scrutinized, Not the Students

Cunningham: The School Choice Debate Has Derailed. It’s Time to Focus on Parents’ Rights & Student Success

Exclusive: Teachers Union Document Reveals Master Plan for Unionizing Charter School Networks

Whitmire: In the State That Created High-Performing Charter Networks, College Success Is Lagging Behind Others

Rafal-Baer: In Education, Preparing Next Generation of Leaders Shouldn’t Be a Revolutionary Idea

Smith: 10 Lessons From Rocketship Education’s First Decade as a Pioneer of K-5 Personalized Learning

Williams: How a Tougher Test and Chaos in D.C. Just Made Things a Whole Lot Harder for Kids Learning English

Analysis: Teachers Union Adds 40,000 Offshore Members While Labor Rolls Stagnate at Home

Quality Early Learning Programs Are a Key to Future Success. Why Don’t States Put Them in Their ESSA Plans?

Bradford: A Free Education System Bought and Sold on the Housing Market, as It Was Intended to Be

Litt: Why Kids in Low-Performing Schools Are Set to Lose Big Under California’s Current ESSA Plan

Reality Check: Before Smartphones Ruined Teenagers, It Was Video Games! And TV! And Elvis!

Lake & Tuchman: Disability Rights Advocates Are Fighting the Wrong Fight on School Choice

Anello: Why the NAACP Should Look Beyond Misleading Narratives & Work With Charters to Lift Up Black Students

Analysis: How OER Is Boosting School Performance and Equity From the Suburbs to the Arctic

Analysis: Which Bothers Randi Weingarten More — Segregation or School Choice?

Howard Fuller: Advancement — the Second ‘A’ in NAACP — Should Apply to Our Children Too

Oreopoulos: No Diploma Without a Plan for the Future? Why Chicago’s New Graduation Requirement Might Work

August 13, 2017

Philip Oreopoulos
Philip Oreopoulos

Philip Oreopoulos is a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Toronto, co-chair of the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab’s education sector, and a researcher with the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Philip Oreopoulos is a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Toronto, co-chair of the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab’s education sector, and a researcher with the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Talking Points

No HS diploma without a plan for the future? Why Chicago’s new graduation requirement might work

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Rising sophomores in Chicago Public Schools (CPS) will have to produce a plan for life after high school to receive their diplomas. Learn.Plan.Succeed, a controversial policy championed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel and recently adopted by the Chicago School Board, will require the class of 2020 to provide proof that they have been accepted into college or the military, are entering a trade or gap-year program, or have a job to graduate. While the program has attracted significant criticism — recently, from Labor Secretary R. Alexander Acosta — a strong body of research shows that it could actually give many students a much-needed boost.

About 1 in 5 students end their formal education with high school, even though the returns on a college education in America have never been greater. In fact, among CPS juniors who planned to attend college, only 59 percent actually applied during their senior year. Learn.Plan.Succeed targets this problem by getting students to not just think about what they want to do in the future, but also have a real option in place the day they graduate.

At J-PAL North America, a research center at MIT, we seek to find out what programs work to lift people out of poverty — including by helping disadvantaged students attend college. One lesson we’ve found is that supporting students through the transition out of high school can make a big difference in where they end up.

Guiding students through the complex college application process, in particular, can ensure that some students will attend college when they otherwise would not have. In Toronto, I evaluated a program called LifeAfterHighSchool, which helped 12th-graders at high schools with historically low college-going rates develop a plan to attend college. In a series of three workshops held during class, students chose a college, completed and submitted applications, and applied for financial aid.

Similar to Learn.Plan.Succeed, the point of LifeAfterHighSchool was not to make every student go to college, but to help keep options open for graduating students — to make the bridge from high school to college easier to take. What happened is that many students decided to cross that bridge. The program led to a 10 percent increase in college enrollment among randomly selected participating schools. This effect was largest among the most disadvantaged students, who likely would have received less support completing their applications at home.

A series of field experiments in New Hampshire also found that in-person mentoring throughout the application process increased college attendance — especially among girls. Participants had to file at least one college application to complete the program — a requirement that resembles Learn.Plan.Succeed. Another experiment found that offering low-income individuals in Ohio and North Carolina immediate assistance and a streamlined process to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) for themselves or their children increased the likelihood that they would attend college by 24 percent.

However, there are real concerns that adding another graduation requirement could prevent the most at-risk students from graduating. Several adjustments to program design — including offering second chances, encouraging multiple applications, and making exceptions for special needs students — could address many concerns.

The graduation requirement alone will not resolve all of CPS’s challenges. A number of other programs rigorously tested in Chicago — such as intensive tutoring to help students who have fallen behind catch up and cognitive behavioral therapy to help high-risk youth avoid crime — have been shown to pay big dividends; and it’s powerless against a looming budgetary crisis. But for a significant number of youth, the new requirement will likely put them on a path to be better prepared for an increasingly challenging labor market.