Analysis: Why Charlottesville Is a Wakeup Call for Educators Who Believe in Equal Promise for All Students

Bertelli: Why a Recent Drop in Charter School Support Is Not About Charter School Quality

Langhorne: When Pursuing Education Becomes a Crime, It’s the System That Should Be Scrutinized, Not the Students

Cunningham: The School Choice Debate Has Derailed. It’s Time to Focus on Parents’ Rights & Student Success

Exclusive: Teachers Union Document Reveals Master Plan for Unionizing Charter School Networks

Whitmire: In the State That Created High-Performing Charter Networks, College Success Is Lagging Behind Others

Rafal-Baer: In Education, Preparing Next Generation of Leaders Shouldn’t Be a Revolutionary Idea

Smith: 10 Lessons From Rocketship Education’s First Decade as a Pioneer of K-5 Personalized Learning

Oreopoulos: No Diploma Without a Plan for the Future? Why Chicago’s New Graduation Requirement Might Work

Williams: How a Tougher Test and Chaos in D.C. Just Made Things a Whole Lot Harder for Kids Learning English

Analysis: Teachers Union Adds 40,000 Offshore Members While Labor Rolls Stagnate at Home

Quality Early Learning Programs Are a Key to Future Success. Why Don’t States Put Them in Their ESSA Plans?

Bradford: A Free Education System Bought and Sold on the Housing Market, as It Was Intended to Be

Litt: Why Kids in Low-Performing Schools Are Set to Lose Big Under California’s Current ESSA Plan

Reality Check: Before Smartphones Ruined Teenagers, It Was Video Games! And TV! And Elvis!

Lake & Tuchman: Disability Rights Advocates Are Fighting the Wrong Fight on School Choice

Anello: Why the NAACP Should Look Beyond Misleading Narratives & Work With Charters to Lift Up Black Students

Analysis: How OER Is Boosting School Performance and Equity From the Suburbs to the Arctic

Analysis: Which Bothers Randi Weingarten More — Segregation or School Choice?

Howard Fuller: Advancement — the Second ‘A’ in NAACP — Should Apply to Our Children Too

5 Key Things You Need to Know About Important New Study on the Benefits of KIPP Pre-K

August 23, 2017

Ashley LiBetti Mitchel
Ashley  LiBetti Mitchel

Ashley LiBetti Mitchel is an early education senior analyst at Bellwether Education Partners.

Ashley LiBetti Mitchel is an early education senior analyst at Bellwether Education Partners.
Talking Points

5 critical things underlying important @KIPP pre-K study from @bellwethered

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Mathematica Policy Research released a study earlier this week looking at the effects of KIPP pre-K on student achievement.  Yes, that’s right — KIPP doesn’t just run charter schools for K-12 students; where it can, it also offers pre-K.

The study looks at the impact of KIPP pre-K and elementary for a randomly selected group of children in Houston and Washington, D.C. and at the effects of KIPP pre-K for a larger sample of students in six states. The results, which have gotten attention on The 74 and other outlets, are promising for proponents of pre-K.

But there are some additional things you should know:

1. Charter schools and pre-K can yield greater benefits for kids than either effort alone

In 2015, Sara Mead, a fellow Bellwether education analyst, and I conducted the first national review of state policies related to pre-K and charter schools. At the time, we knew that both charters and pre-K, when done well, can be extremely powerful for children. We hypothesized that, combined, they could produce even greater effects.

The most recent Mathematica study bears that out. A key finding is that both KIPP pre-K and KIPP elementary schools are good—but the combination of both is even better. Children who attended a KIPP school from pre-K through second grade had higher math and reading achievement than their peers who attended other schools. The study also found that KIPP students who started in pre-K may have an advantage over KIPP students who started in kindergarten, particularly for reading outcomes.

2. But policies in many states prevent students and families from realizing these benefits

Our research found nearly a 1,000 charter schools serve preschoolers in many states — but we also found they often face substantial barriers in doing so. Specifically, current interpretation of policy in nine states prevents charter schools from opening a pre-K program. Ohio’s charter law, for example, says charter schools can only admit students between the ages of 5 and 22. Other barriers are more subtle: Some states don’t allow charter schools to automatically enroll pre-K students into their kindergarten program, or only allow school districts to determine which schools receive pre-K funding. Many of these laws weren’t intended to prevent charter schools from serving preschoolers. But enabling KIPP and other charter schools to serve more preschoolers will require policy changes in some states.

KIPP runs schools in a variety of states where state policy makes it easy for charter pre-K programs to exist — like those in D.C. and Texas — but also in states where policy creates obstacles. These states are missing a potential opportunity to amplify both pre-K and charter benefits.

3. What happens to children after pre-K is crucial

This study is particularly valuable because it was able to follow preschoolers through second grade in KIPP schools. That’s somewhat unique among studies of pre-K programs. Mathematica found that the combination of KIPP pre-K and early elementary had a strong, positive effect for children through second grade but that non-KIPP students were able to "catch up," on one measure of reading, between kindergarten and second grade. In other words, children’s experiences through early elementary school affect their growth trajectory.

This finding affirms recommendations from a recent consensus panel of early childhood researchers: "Children’s early learning trajectories depend on the quality of their learning experiences not only before and during their pre-K year, but also following the pre-K year. Classroom experiences early in elementary school can serve as charging stations for sustaining and amplifying pre-K learning gains."

Other research, such as the evaluation of the Chicago Child-Parent Centers and a recent study of the effects of Head Start, also suggest that improvements in elementary school quality can amplify the effect of high-quality pre-K and yields the greatest boost for kids.

4. Assuming rigorous academics and comprehensive services as competing alternatives is a false dichotomy

The KIPP pre-K programs in this study combine high-quality early learning with a range of health, family, and other services such as speech, physical, and occupational therapists and social workers; parent education and family engagement; health screenings; and referrals to outside services.

Public policy debates about preschool, and education more generally, often present a false dichotomy between education reforms like charter schools and strategies that emphasize meeting children’s holistic health, social, and other needs. This study shows that it’s possible to provide comprehensive services within a high-performing charter school model that also prioritizes rigorous academics.

5.  This research is incredibly helpful for the field at large, but less so for individual early childhood programs

In its simplest form, this study asks, "Does KIPP's charter pre-K program work?" Its findings suggest that pre-K can yield benefits for kids, so more charter schools may want to consider adding pre-K to their offerings, and states should eliminate policy barriers that prevent them for doing so.

But it doesn’t help charter school leaders — or other early childhood educators, for that matter — decide what their preschool programs should look like. To be more useful for program design, future research should ask, "What aspects of this charter pre-K program are effective? For whom or what group of students? On what different outcomes or indicators? Under what circumstances?"

Looking more closely at the practices of high-performing programs—as we do in Education Next and as a recent ConnCAN report also does—is a promising starting point.

Taken together, both the study’s findings and its practical and policy implications suggest that high-quality charter pre-K programs are a promising opportunity for children.

Andy Rotherham co-founded Bellwether Education Partners. He sits on The 74’s board of directors and serves as one of the site’s senior editors.